Comments on: Fossil Gulch Wind Park

By: popcorntayto

popcorntayto — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:25:33 +0000

crap and hate d yanks

By: Fighterkalle

Fighterkalle — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:11:59 +0000

Das is ne 1.5er von uns….wie kommst du auf 10MW????
Wenn man keine Ahnung hat….

By: tintenigel

tintenigel — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:58:21 +0000

Das soll eine 10 MW Anlage sein? Da lachen ja die Hühner. Schaut euch mal die E 126 von Enercon an!

By: damanlov

damanlov — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:02:40 +0000

Indeed, the facility has a production capacity of 10.5MW actually, that is not to say that it will produce 10.5MW constantly, but depending on wind conditions it is capable of producing up to that amount.

By: damanlov

damanlov — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:00:00 +0000

I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t personally mind having a field of turbines next to my house, but I don’t want a nuclear plant anywhere near me!

By: damanlov

damanlov — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:55:59 +0000

If you looked at the numbers carefully, you would have realized that nuclear power is the most expensive form of power generation, and the only reason it’s seen as cheap power is because the government pays the difference! Wind, hydro and solar power are still the best eco-friendly ways of producing power.

By: theninja001

theninja001 — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:06:26 +0000

you’re right, I’m sure the people who finance it didn’t “look at the numbers carefully” they love throwing away money….retard

By: DJJASON47

DJJASON47 — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:56:27 +0000

If you have looked at the numbers carefully, you have found that it takes a huge number of wind towers to equal just one conventional or nuke plant. We could cover our countryside with those giant towers and not make a real difference. Typical power plant produces up to 2000 MW of dependable, dispatchable power. One giant wind tower produces only about 1.5 MW of 20% efficient, intermittent power that needs to be backed up by a conventional power plant anyhow. What numbers have YOU been at?

By: Teratornis

Teratornis — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:09:14 +0000

I don’t know any wind power proponents who claim wind is the only source of power we need. However, I have looked at the numbers pretty carefully and I’m impressed by the potential of wind. I’d give you references but YouTube doesn’t accept links in these replies. I don’t have a huge problem with more nukes, it’s just that a nuke plant takes ten years to build, compared to a few months for a wind farm. Wind farms can expand incrementally and that’s important.

By: DJJASON47

DJJASON47 — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:22:48 +0000

How about advancing clean coal technology, nuclear, horizontal drilling both offshore and such places as ANWAR, MORE hydro, oil sands, etc. There is no way to satisfy radical environmentalism, we must come together and compromise. The lie of industrial wind can easily be seen if you just run the numbers. It cannot possibly make a dent in our electric needs!